This is an incredibly broad question, but there's an important issue at the heart of it that will help in understanding an academic experience at URI.
Remember, URI is a public state university that people generally are not quick to associate with prestige. This leads several major archtypes of professors and students that teach at and attend a school like URI. There are professors who are just starting out and hope that they can advance their respective careers beyond URI, professors who found themselves unable to do just that and had to "settle" for URI, professors who are obligated to teach regardless of their desire (ex. researchers and graduate students) and professors who are well aware of what kind of school URI is and choose to teach there for that reason. It is important to note here that none of these are inherently better than any of the others, and you will likely have a professor that fits into each of these archtypes before completing a degree. However, the background of a professor is incredibly influencial on things like approachability, enthusiasm, relatability, and how knowledgable they will be in helping with any given problem a student may present to him or her. Knowing something about a professor also gives them all the more reason to know something about you, and some of those relationships will be absolutely invaluable later on as graduation nears.
Some of the professors in the last category are absolutely incredible people who can answer any question about the academic process (or defer to the exact person who can) and do so willingly and enthusiastically. This is, of course, a rare breed of human being in general. Some of the best and most helpful professors I've had were simply recent graduates who still remembered how they learned best in school and applied that to their own classes. There are plenty of professors who do not fit any of these archtypes, and some people find them fantastic or terrible because of this.
The other thing to remember is that your milage will always vary. I have heard incredibly negative things about most of my favorite professors, and some of these things were very justified. Knowing your professors goes with knowing yourself. The major archtypes of students at URI are too many to fit in one list: stoners, Greeks, people with athletic scholarships, people in school because their parents told them to, people in school because they had no better ideas, so-called "dumb" kids who worked as hard as they could in high school and were ecstatic to get into college at all, kids who could have worked harder to get into a more prestigious school but didn't care enough to (more on this later), people attending on their parents' dime, people attending on the governments' dime.
All of this blends into academics. Describing "the academics at your school" entirely depends on your approach to college. If you are going to get a degree because you like a -subject-, then you will probably find that subject at URI. Pharmacy, marine biology, and nursing are among the standout programs if you are invested in getting a quality education in your field of interest (which you probably should be, if this is your appraoach). If you are like me and enjoy learning and thinking and applying skills but not enough to like the idea of applying all that to a single field for the rest of your life, then you will likely join the academic department that you get the most out of. Particularly interesting here is the attitude in the departments that grant the typically "useless" degrees. Almost member of these departments is so because they enjoy what they do and get more out of it than anything else they have encountered.
The point is this: the quality of departments at URI seems to vary wildly. And while some of the stories I've heard about the chemistry department make cameos in my nightmares, some people will get more out of sticking to their subject no matter what while some will get more out of being part of an environment they thrive in. There will come a point where you will need to decide on one, both, or neither.